Should You Use AI (Artificial Intelligence) in Fantasy Football? Can it actually help you win games — maybe even a championship? Last year, I partnered with Greg Kellogg, an FSWA Hall of Famer, to put it to the test in a head-to-head battle against AI. The only problem: we didn’t track the results. (Lesson learned — humans forget, algorithms don’t.) In 2025, we’re doing it right. We’ll be tracking results weekly, documenting everything, and sharing it with you. By the end of the season, you’ll finally have the answer to the question every fantasy manager quietly asks themselves: To AI, or Not To AI? Each week, I’ll be joined by Sir Whittington (Google AI’s alter ego) and KROG. We’ll each be assigned three random players — because the biggest fantasy headaches almost always come down to your flex spot. How It Works One WR or RB ranked outside the top 24 One TE ranked outside the top 12 Our mission: pick the guy who can beat his projection and make us look smart Your mission: decide whether to trust me, or the algorithm that also recommends socks after you shop for lawn chairs And here’s the twist — the “winner” each week is not the player who scores the most points. The highest score is actually the losing outcome. Lowest season-long score wins the title. Speaking of title if you are in your fantasy playoff congrats. Here are the results from Week 15.
Week 15 Results:
WR Kayshon Boutte- 4 points
RB Jordan Mason- 2.9 points
TE George Kittle-22.8 points
George Kittle was an easy call last week as everyone involved had him at number one. As for the yearly results for Man vs. Machines is as follows:
Sir Whittington-36 points
Krog-48 points
Tipp- 36points
Sir Whittington Response:
Fantasy playoffs are rarely about chasing perfection. They’re about avoiding disaster while quietly hoping for a miracle. With that in mind, let’s examine three familiar names that sit firmly in the “you could do worse” category.
Jordan Addison continues to be the dependable understudy who somehow still gets plenty of stage time. Playing opposite Justin Jefferson ensures softer coverage and a steady diet of targets, particularly against a Giants secondary that’s been politely allowing wide receivers to do whatever they fancy. The catch, of course, is that Jefferson remains the main event, meaning Addison’s weekly output can feel like waiting for a bus—sometimes three come at once, sometimes none at all. Bottom line: A sensible PPR starts with a decent floor. Just don’t expect him to upstage Jefferson unless chaos ensues, which, to be fair, it often does.
Tyrone Tracy Jr. (RB, Giants) Tracy has quietly become the Giants’ most trustworthy offensive option, which is a bit like being the best umbrella in a hurricane useful, but still slightly alarming. The volume is there, the passing-game role boosts his PPR appeal, and he’s seeing enough touches to justify RB2 or FLEX consideration. The downside? Ball-security concerns and the ever-present threat of the Giants suddenly deciding to “try something new.” Bottom line: Startable volume and a safe-ish floor, but keep expectations realistic. He’s a more dependable civil servant than a fantasy rock star.
When Mark Andrews scores, it’s glorious. When he doesn’t, it’s baffling. His chemistry with Lamar Jackson in the red zone remains elite, making him a weekly threat to ruin your opponent’s Sunday. Unfortunately, inconsistent targets and increased competition mean he can disappear for long stretches, especially in tougher matchups. It’s all very dramatic, in a distinctly tight-end sort of way. Bottom line: You’re chasing touchdowns here. Start him for the upside, but accept that the floor may involve a lot of tea-sipping and sighing.
KROG’S Response:
n a pivotal fantasy week, understanding floor versus ceiling can be the difference between advancing and going home. Tyrone Tracy Jr., Jordan Addison, and Mark Andrews all present different risk profiles, making lineup decisions especially important. Here’s how to approach each option.
Tyrone Tracy Jr. has emerged as the safest option of this group due to his steady role in the Giants’ offense. He has operated as the clear lead back, consistently seeing 15 or more touches per game while maintaining involvement in the passing game. That workload provides a dependable PPR floor for fantasy managers seeking stability. The matchup adds upside, as Minnesota has been vulnerable against running backs, particularly those who can contribute as receivers. While the Giants’ low team total limits Tracy’s true ceiling, his volume and goal-line opportunities keep him firmly in RB2 or flex consideration. Bottom line: Tracy offers reliable volume and a strong floor, making him the safest fantasy play of the group with modest upside tied to touchdowns.
Jordan Addison provides the highest ceiling among these options thanks to his big-play ability in a productive Vikings offense. A matchup against a struggling Giants secondary gives him the potential to break the slate if he connects on a deep ball or finds the end zone. That said, his weekly role remains volatile. With Justin Jefferson commanding attention and targets, Addison’s usage can fluctuate, forcing him to rely on touchdowns or explosive plays to deliver strong fantasy value. This makes him better suited for managers chasing upside rather than consistency. Bottom line: Addison is a high-risk, high-reward option whose fantasy success depends on splash plays and scoring rather than steady volume.
Mark Andrews still carries name recognition and red-zone appeal, which keeps him in the fantasy conversation. Lamar Jackson continues to look his way in scoring situations, preserving multi-touchdown upside in favorable game scripts. However, Andrews’ weekly floor has become increasingly fragile. Reduced yardage and a declining target share largely due to Isaiah Likely’s involvement make him difficult to trust without a touchdown. In tighter matchups, that risk can be costly. Bottom line: Andrews remains a touchdown-or-bust fantasy option, offering upside in the red zone but carrying one of the lowest floors among starting tight ends.
Tipp’s Response:
This is it in playoff weeks for fantasy football can be unforgiving. They can also be rewarding when you make the right move or moves to make it to the next round. Go get that championship belt! For this week here are how I would consider these players in my flex spots.
Tyrone Tracy operated as the lead back last week, logging 18 touches and scoring both a rushing and receiving touchdown. With Cam Skattebo still recovering and potentially missing time in 2026, Tracy, who remains under contract, is showing what he can provide for the team moving forward. This is something we see every season in the NFL: players recognize opportunity and seize it by showcasing their talent. This week, the Vikings travel to New York, which puts Jaxson Dart and the Giants’ passing game on high alert. Minnesota has been tough against opposing passing attacks, but “leaky” is an accurate way to describe their run defense. Recently, Washington was the only team that struggled to find consistent running lanes; most other opponents have had success on the ground. Tracy should once again lead the backfield in touches and see prime opportunities near the goal line. The key variable is whether Dart can move the ball effectively, including getting Tracy involved in the passing game for easy yardage. It’s also worth noting that the Vikings have made it a priority all season to limit running back targets, which could slightly cap Tracy’s receiving upside. Bottom Line: Tyrone Tracy is positioned to remain the Giants’ lead back with strong touch volume and goal-line equity against a vulnerable Vikings run defense, making him a high-upside RB2 with touchdown potential—his ceiling rising if Jaxson Dart can consistently move the offense and involve him as a receiver.
Targets have been hard to come by for Jordan Addison, which is the main reason he doesn’t earn the top spot this week. The matchup is certainly favorable for Addison and his teammates, but that’s also part of the issue. Not only does Justin Jefferson command a significant share of the targets, but the Vikings’ offense has become increasingly spread out. In an effort to simplify the offense for J.J. McCarthy as he progresses through his reads, Minnesota appears to be asking him to distribute the ball more evenly among his pass catchers. Who would have predicted Jalen Nailor seeing more targets than Addison in Week 15? Not even Nailor himself. Add to that the fact that T.J. Hockenson is heating up as his chemistry with McCarthy continues to grow, and the competition for targets becomes even more concerning. Bottom line: Heading into a must-win week, navigating this level of target volatility is not ideal. While Addison has the talent and matchup to produce, the crowded target tree and unpredictable usage make him a risky fantasy start with a capped ceiling in a week where reliability matters most.
Mark Andrews signed an extension with the Ravens on December 3, and in the two games since getting paid again, he’s averaging just 3.45 fantasy points. It may already be too late for the Ravens to get their money back, but if you’re looking for a “money” fantasy performance, you should look elsewhere. On paper, this is a favorable matchup against the Patriots, who allow an average of six receptions per game to tight ends. However, there is one glaring issue: Isaiah Likely continues to siphon targets away from Andrews. In Week 15, against the Bengals, arguably the easiest matchup for tight ends, both Andrews and Likely laid rotten eggs. At this point, trusting anyone in this offense feels risky. I say no, and I want no part of the Ravens in my fantasy lineups this week. Bottom line: Despite a strong matchup, Andrews’ declining production and shared usage with Isaiah Likely make him an unreliable fantasy option, better left on the bench in a week where upside and dependability are crucial.
Sir Whittington
- WR Jordan Addison
- RB Tyrone Tracy
- TE Mark Andrews
KROG:
- RB Tyrone Tracy
- WR Jordan Addison
- TE Mark Andrews
Tipp:
- RB Tyrone Tracy
- WR Jordan Addison
- TE Mark Andrews
The Sports Affiliation 